NEWS & VIEWS

In the case, City of Pittsburgh v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Wilson), the judge granted a review petition to expand the work injury to included an aggravation of a pre-existing degenerative cervical condition and relied upon a prior independent medical examination (IME) report. The Court led that the judge’s determination was not supported by the… Read more

During the case of Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Community Medical Center), a medical provider disputed the amount the insurer reimbursed it for treatment provided to a claimant by filing an application for fee review with the Bureau on the 85th day after the original billing date. The insurer asserted that… Read more

In the case of Trevdan Building Supply v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Pope), the Commonwealth Court ruled that since the claimant returned to work without restriction and since there was a reduction in overtime for all employees, a suspension of benefits was appropriate. The panel further noted that this is true even where claimants return… Read more

In the case of Shannopin v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Sereg), the Commonwealth Court affirmed a judge’s decision after multiple remands, because he made a finding that the claimant was totally disabled from the work force in 2002 and that, thus, he had not removed himself from it via retirement.

For the case of Washington v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (State Police), the Court upheld the denial of a mental/mental claim, because photographing infant murder victims is not an abnormal working condition. The claimant admitted during his testimony that photographing such subjects was a foreseeable part of his job as a photographer for the State… Read more

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that IREs are unconstitutional. Section 306 (a)(2) has been deleted from the act. Anyone who was evaluated for an IRE should immediately talk to counsel regarding their legal rights. Call us now at 215.587.8400.

In the case of Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Mahalick), on appeal, the employer argued that the claimant’s review petition was time-barred, because it was not filed within three years of the last payment of compensation. The Court did not accept the employer’s argument and affirmed the grant of a review petition… Read more